bibliography, i-m
¶ 1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 “In Media Res.” MediaCommons. 2006-present. http://mcpress.media-commons.org/imr/.
¶ 2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 “An Introduction to Using Philica.” Philica. http://philica.com/tutorial.php.
¶ 3 Leave a comment on paragraph 3 0 Iskold, Alex. “Facebook: What if More Is Less?.” ReadWriteWeb. 27 Sep 2007. http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_what_if_more_is_less.php.
¶ 4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 0 Jackson, Shelley. “Skin.” Shelley Jackson’s Ineradicable Stain. Aug 2003. http://www.ineradicablestain.com/skin.html.
¶ 5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 0 Jenkins, Henry. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press, 2006.
¶ 6 Leave a comment on paragraph 6 0 Jensen, Michael. “Authority 3.0: Friend or Foe to Scholars?” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 39.1 (2007): 297-307.
¶ 7 Leave a comment on paragraph 7 0 —. “Presses Have Little to Fear From Google.” Chronicle of Higher Education 8 Jul 2005. http://chronicle.com/article/Presses-Have-Little-to-Fear/25775/.
¶ 8 Leave a comment on paragraph 8 0 —. “The New Metrics of Scholarly Authority.” Chronicle of Higher Education 15 Jun 2007. http://chronicle.com/article/The-New-Metrics-of-Scholarly/5449.
¶ 9 Leave a comment on paragraph 9 0 Joyce, Michael. Othermindedness: The Emergence of Network Culture. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000.
¶ 10 Leave a comment on paragraph 10 0 Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy. http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/.
¶ 11 Leave a comment on paragraph 11 0 Keen, Andrew. The Cult of the Amateur: How Today’s Internet Is Killing Our Culture. Boston: Nicholas Brealey, 2007.
¶ 12 Leave a comment on paragraph 12 0 Keep, Christopher. “The Disturbing Liveliness of Machines: Rethinking the Body in Hypertext Theory and Fiction.” Cyberspace Textuality: Computer Technology and Literary Theory. Ed. Marie-Laure Ryan. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999. 164-181.
¶ 13 Leave a comment on paragraph 13 0 Kelty, Christopher M. Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham: Duke University Press, 2008.
¶ 14 Leave a comment on paragraph 14 0 Kelty, Christopher M. et al. “Anthropology of/in Circulation: The Future of Open Access and Scholarly Societies.” Cultural Anthropology 23.3 (2008): 559-588.
¶ 15 Leave a comment on paragraph 15 0 Kernan, Alvin B. The Death of Literature. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990.
¶ 16 Leave a comment on paragraph 16 0 Kirschenbaum, Matthew. “Done: Finishing Projects in the Digital Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 3.2 (2009). 3 Aug 2009 http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/3/2/000037.html.
¶ 17 Leave a comment on paragraph 17 0 —. Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2008.
¶ 18 Leave a comment on paragraph 18 0 —. “Untitled comment.” Planned Obsolescence 16 Dec 2003. http://www.plannedobsolescence.net/in-the-interim/#comment-1835.
¶ 19 Leave a comment on paragraph 19 0 Knight, Kim. “Collex.” Transliteracies Project: Research in the Technological, Social, and Cultural Practices of Online Reading. http://transliteracies.english.ucsb.edu/post/research-project/research-clearinghouse-individual/research-reports/collex.
¶ 20 Leave a comment on paragraph 20 0 Koehler, Wallace. “A longitudinal study of Web pages continued: a consideration of document persistence.” Information Research 9.2 (2004). http://informationr.net/ir/9-2/paper174.html.
¶ 21 Leave a comment on paragraph 21 0 Koop, Thomas, and Ulrich Poschl. “Systems: An open, two-stage peer-review journal.” Nature (2006). http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04988.html.
¶ 22 Leave a comment on paragraph 22 0 Kristeva, Julia. “Word, Dialogue and Novel.” The Kristeva Reader. Ed. Toril Moi. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. 34-61.
¶ 23 Leave a comment on paragraph 23 0 Kronick, David A. “Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism.” Journal of the American Medical Association 263.10 (1990): 1321-1322.
¶ 24 Leave a comment on paragraph 24 0 —. “Devant le deluge” and other essays on early modern scientific communication. Lanham: Scarecrow Press, 2004.
¶ 25 Leave a comment on paragraph 25 0 Kroski, Ellyssa. “Authority in the Age of the Amateur.” InfoTangle 20 Feb 2006. http://infotangle.blogsome.com/2006/02/20/authority-in-the-age-of-the-amateur/.
¶ 26 Leave a comment on paragraph 26 0 Landow, George P. Hypertext 2.0. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.
¶ 27 Leave a comment on paragraph 27 0 Lanham, Richard A. The Economics of Attention: Style and Substance in the Age of Information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
¶ 28 Leave a comment on paragraph 28 0 —. “From Book to Screen: Four Recent Studies.” College English 54.2 (1992): 199-206.
¶ 29 Leave a comment on paragraph 29 0 Lanier, Jaron. “Digital Maoism: The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism.” Edge (2006). http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier06/lanier06_index.html.
¶ 30 Leave a comment on paragraph 30 0 Lapham, Lewis, ed. Iraq Study Group Report. Institute for the Future of the Book, 2006. http://www.futureofthebook.org/iraqreport/.
¶ 31 Leave a comment on paragraph 31 0 —. The President’s Address to the Nation. Institute for the Future of the Book, 2007. http://www.futureofthebook.org/iraqspeech/.
¶ 32 Leave a comment on paragraph 32 0 Lauro, Sarah Juliet, and Karen Embry. “A Zombie Manifesto: The Nonhuman Condition in the Era of Advanced Capitalism.” Boundary 2: An International Journal of Literature and Culture 35.2 (2008): 85-108.
¶ 33 Leave a comment on paragraph 33 0 Lavoie, Brian, and Lorcan Dempsey. “Thirteen Ways of Looking at…Digital Preservation.” D-Lib Magazine 10.7/8 (2004). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july04/lavoie/07lavoie.html.
¶ 34 Leave a comment on paragraph 34 0 Lazinger, Susan S. Digital Preservation and Metadata: History, Theory, Practice. Englewood, Colo: Libraries Unlimited, 2001.
¶ 35 Leave a comment on paragraph 35 0 Le Comptoir des presses d’universités. http://www.lcdpu.fr/.
¶ 36 Leave a comment on paragraph 36 0 Lessig, Lawrence. Code: Version 2.0. New York: Basic Books, 2006.
¶ 37 Leave a comment on paragraph 37 0 —. The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Random House, 2001.
¶ 38 Leave a comment on paragraph 38 0 Lessing, Doris. The Golden Notebook. New York: Institute for the Future of the Book, 2008. http://thegoldennotebook.org/.
¶ 39 Leave a comment on paragraph 39 0 Levien, Raph. “Advogato’s Trust Metric.” Advogato. http://www.advogato.org/trust-metric.html.
¶ 40 Leave a comment on paragraph 40 0 Levinson, Paul. The Soft Edge: A Natural History and Future of the Information Revolution. New York: Routledge, 1997.
¶ 41 Leave a comment on paragraph 41 0 Lieberman, Mark et al. Language Log. http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/.
¶ 42 Leave a comment on paragraph 42 0 Liu, Alan et al. Born-Again Bits: A Framework for Migrating Electronic Literature. Electronic Literature Organization, 2005. http://eliterature.org/pad/bab.html.
¶ 43 Leave a comment on paragraph 43 0 “LOCKSS Alliance.” LOCKSS. http://lockss.org/lockss/LOCKSS_Alliance.
¶ 44 Leave a comment on paragraph 44 0 Long, Elizabeth. “Textual Interpretation as Collective Action.” The Ethnography of Reading. Ed. Jonathan Boyarin. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993. 180-211.
¶ 45 Leave a comment on paragraph 45 0 Luey, Beth. Handbook for Academic Authors. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
¶ 46 Leave a comment on paragraph 46 0 Lynch, Clifford. “The Battle to Define the Future of the Book in a Digital World.” First Monday 6.6 (2001). http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/864/773.
¶ 47 Leave a comment on paragraph 47 0 Manoff, Marlene. “The Digital Record and the Future of Libraries.” Conference paper: Media in Transition 6. Cambridge, 2009.
¶ 48 Leave a comment on paragraph 48 0 Manovich, Lev. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2001.
¶ 49 Leave a comment on paragraph 49 0 “Marginalia: A WordPress Plugin for Social Texts.” http://marginalia.cc/.
¶ 50 Leave a comment on paragraph 50 0 marthaquest. “Comment on Doris Lessing’s The Golden Notebook – Suggestions.” 13 Nov 2008. http://thegoldennotebook.org/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=51&page=1#Item_0.
¶ 51 Leave a comment on paragraph 51 0 McCown, Frank et al. “The Availability and Persistence of Web References in D-Lib Magazine.” Proceedings of the 5th International Web Archiving Workshop (IWAW 2005). Vienna, Austria, 2005. 24 Jul 2009 http://www.iwaw.net/05/papers/iwaw05-mccown1.pdf.
¶ 52 Leave a comment on paragraph 52 0 McGann, Jerome. “Information Technology and the Troubled Humanities.” TEXT Technology 14.2 (2005): 105-21.
¶ 53 Leave a comment on paragraph 53 0 MediaCommons: A Digital Scholarly Network. http://mcpress.media-commons.org/.
¶ 54 Leave a comment on paragraph 54 0 MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. 7th ed. New York: Modern Language Association of America, 2009.
¶ 55 Leave a comment on paragraph 55 0 Montfort, Nick, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. Acid-Free Bits: Recommendations for Long-Lasting Electronic Literature. Electronic Literature Organization, 2004. http://eliterature.org/pad/afb.html.
¶ 56 Leave a comment on paragraph 56 0 Moulthrop, Stuart. “After the Last Generation: Rethinking Scholarship in the Days of Serious Play.” Proceedings of the 6th Digital Arts and Culture Conference (2005). http://iat.ubalt.edu/moulthrop/essays/dac2005.pdf.
¶ 57
Leave a comment on paragraph 57 0
Mullen, Carol A., and Frances K. Kochan. “Issues of Collaborative Authorship in Higher Education.” The Educational Forum 65.2 (2001): 128-135.
Muto, Albert. The University of California Press: The Early Years, 1893-1953. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
¶ 58 Leave a comment on paragraph 58 0 Mylonas, Elli, and Allen Renear. “The Text Encoding Initiative at 10: Not Just an Interchange Format Anymore – But a New Research Community.” Computers and the Humanities 33.1 (1999): 1-9.
Comments
0 Comments on the whole Page
Leave a comment on the whole Page
0 Comments on paragraph 1
Leave a comment on paragraph 1
0 Comments on paragraph 2
Leave a comment on paragraph 2
0 Comments on paragraph 3
Leave a comment on paragraph 3
0 Comments on paragraph 4
Leave a comment on paragraph 4
0 Comments on paragraph 5
Leave a comment on paragraph 5
0 Comments on paragraph 6
Leave a comment on paragraph 6
0 Comments on paragraph 7
Leave a comment on paragraph 7
0 Comments on paragraph 8
Leave a comment on paragraph 8
0 Comments on paragraph 9
Leave a comment on paragraph 9
0 Comments on paragraph 10
Leave a comment on paragraph 10
0 Comments on paragraph 11
Leave a comment on paragraph 11
0 Comments on paragraph 12
Leave a comment on paragraph 12
0 Comments on paragraph 13
Leave a comment on paragraph 13
0 Comments on paragraph 14
Leave a comment on paragraph 14
0 Comments on paragraph 15
Leave a comment on paragraph 15
0 Comments on paragraph 16
Leave a comment on paragraph 16
0 Comments on paragraph 17
Leave a comment on paragraph 17
0 Comments on paragraph 18
Leave a comment on paragraph 18
0 Comments on paragraph 19
Leave a comment on paragraph 19
0 Comments on paragraph 20
Leave a comment on paragraph 20
0 Comments on paragraph 21
Leave a comment on paragraph 21
0 Comments on paragraph 22
Leave a comment on paragraph 22
0 Comments on paragraph 23
Leave a comment on paragraph 23
0 Comments on paragraph 24
Leave a comment on paragraph 24
0 Comments on paragraph 25
Leave a comment on paragraph 25
0 Comments on paragraph 26
Leave a comment on paragraph 26
0 Comments on paragraph 27
Leave a comment on paragraph 27
0 Comments on paragraph 28
Leave a comment on paragraph 28
0 Comments on paragraph 29
Leave a comment on paragraph 29
0 Comments on paragraph 30
Leave a comment on paragraph 30
0 Comments on paragraph 31
Leave a comment on paragraph 31
0 Comments on paragraph 32
Leave a comment on paragraph 32
0 Comments on paragraph 33
Leave a comment on paragraph 33
0 Comments on paragraph 34
Leave a comment on paragraph 34
0 Comments on paragraph 35
Leave a comment on paragraph 35
0 Comments on paragraph 36
Leave a comment on paragraph 36
0 Comments on paragraph 37
Leave a comment on paragraph 37
0 Comments on paragraph 38
Leave a comment on paragraph 38
0 Comments on paragraph 39
Leave a comment on paragraph 39
0 Comments on paragraph 40
Leave a comment on paragraph 40
0 Comments on paragraph 41
Leave a comment on paragraph 41
0 Comments on paragraph 42
Leave a comment on paragraph 42
0 Comments on paragraph 43
Leave a comment on paragraph 43
0 Comments on paragraph 44
Leave a comment on paragraph 44
0 Comments on paragraph 45
Leave a comment on paragraph 45
0 Comments on paragraph 46
Leave a comment on paragraph 46
0 Comments on paragraph 47
Leave a comment on paragraph 47
0 Comments on paragraph 48
Leave a comment on paragraph 48
0 Comments on paragraph 49
Leave a comment on paragraph 49
0 Comments on paragraph 50
Leave a comment on paragraph 50
0 Comments on paragraph 51
Leave a comment on paragraph 51
0 Comments on paragraph 52
Leave a comment on paragraph 52
0 Comments on paragraph 53
Leave a comment on paragraph 53
0 Comments on paragraph 54
Leave a comment on paragraph 54
0 Comments on paragraph 55
Leave a comment on paragraph 55
0 Comments on paragraph 56
Leave a comment on paragraph 56
0 Comments on paragraph 57
Leave a comment on paragraph 57
0 Comments on paragraph 58
Leave a comment on paragraph 58