|
Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy

bibliography, n-s

1 Leave a comment on paragraph 1 0 National Endowment for the Arts. Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America. National Endowment for the Arts, 2004. http://www.nea.gov/pub/ReadingAtRisk.pdf.

2 Leave a comment on paragraph 2 0 —. Reading on the Rise: A New Chapter in American Literacy. National Endowment for the Arts, 2009. http://www.nea.gov/research/ReadingonRise.pdf.

3 Leave a comment on paragraph 3 0 —. To Read or Not To Read: A Question of National Consequence. National Endowment for the Arts, 2007. http://www.nea.gov/research/ToRead.pdf.

4 Leave a comment on paragraph 4 0 Nelson, T. H. “Complex Information Processing: A File Structure for the Complex, the Changing, and the Indeterminate.” Association for Computing Machinery: Proceedings of the 1965 20th National Conference. New York: ACM Press, 1965. 84-100.

5 Leave a comment on paragraph 5 0 Neubauer, Bruce J., and Gene A. Brewer. “Virtual Scholarly Collaboration: A Case Study.” Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 19.4 (2004): 92-98.

6 Leave a comment on paragraph 6 0 No Brief Candle: Reconceiving Research Libraries for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2008. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub142/pub142.pdf.

7 Leave a comment on paragraph 7 0 Nunberg, Geoffrey. “The Places of Books in the Age of Electronic Reproduction.” Representations 42 (1993): 13-37.

8 Leave a comment on paragraph 8 0 O’Donnell, James. “The Pragmatics of the New: Trithemius, McLuhan, Cassiodorus.” The Future of the Book. Ed. Geoffrey Nunberg. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996. 37-62.

9 Leave a comment on paragraph 9 1 “Office of Digital Scholarly Publishing.” Penn State University Libraries. http://www.libraries.psu.edu/psul/odsp.html.

10 Leave a comment on paragraph 10 0 Ong, Walter J. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Routledge, 2002.

11 Leave a comment on paragraph 11 0 “Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting.” Open Archives Initiative. http://www.openarchives.org/pmh/.

12 Leave a comment on paragraph 12 0 “Open Media Commons.” Open Media Commons. http://openmediacommons.org/.

13 Leave a comment on paragraph 13 0 Owens, Howard. “What We’ve Learned from Blogs – How to Grow Audience.” Media Blog. 9 Jul 2007. http://www.howardowens.com/2007/what-weve-learnd-from-blogs-how-to-grow-audience/.

14 Leave a comment on paragraph 14 0 Paskin, Norman. “Digital Object Identifier (DOI) System.” Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences. Third Edition. Taylor & Francis, 2010.

15 Leave a comment on paragraph 15 0 Peters, Douglas P., and Stephen J. Ceci. “Peer Review Practices of Psychological Journals: The Fate of Published Articles, Submitted Again.” Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004. 191-214.

16 Leave a comment on paragraph 16 0 “Philica FAQs.” Philica. http://philica.com/faq.php.

17 Leave a comment on paragraph 17 0 Pliny. http://pliny.cch.kcl.ac.uk/index.html.

18 Leave a comment on paragraph 18 0 Poe, Marshall. “The Hive.” The Atlantic Sep 2006. http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200609/wikipedia.

19 Leave a comment on paragraph 19 0 “Portico’s Archival Approach.” Portico. http://portico.org/about/approach.html.

20 Leave a comment on paragraph 20 0 Pöschl, Ulrich. “Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance.” Learned Publishing 17.2 (2004): 105-113.

21 Leave a comment on paragraph 21 0 Poster, Mark. The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.

22 Leave a comment on paragraph 22 0 —. What’s the Matter with the Internet? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.

23 Leave a comment on paragraph 23 0 Pranzatelli, Robert. “A Brief History of Yale University Press.” Yale University Press. http://yalepress.yale.edu/yupbooks/centennial/briefhistory.asp.

24 Leave a comment on paragraph 24 0 Pressman, Jessica. “Vectors: Journal of Culture and Technology in a Dynamic Vernacular.” Transliteracies Project: Research in the Technological, Social, and Cultural Practices of Online Reading. http://transliteracies.english.ucsb.edu/post/research-project/research-clearinghouse-individual/research-reports/vectors-journal-of-culture-and-technology-in-a-dynamic-vernacular.

25 Leave a comment on paragraph 25 0 Price, Leah. “Reading: The State of the Discipline.” Book History 7 (2004): 303-320.

26 Leave a comment on paragraph 26 0 “Quick Facts.” Handle System 29 Apr 2009. 26 Jul 2009 http://handle.net/factsheet.html.

27 Leave a comment on paragraph 27 0 Quinet, Raphæl. “Social Experiment on Slashdot Moderation.” Advogato. 24 Jan 2000. http://www.advogato.org/article/27.html.

28 Leave a comment on paragraph 28 0 Radway, Janice. “Research Universities, Periodical Publication, and the Circulation of Professional Expertise: On the Significance of Middlebrow Authority.” Critical Inquiry 31.1 (2004): 203-228.

29 Leave a comment on paragraph 29 0 Raggett, Dave. “A History of HTML.” 1998. http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett/book4/ch02.html.

30 Leave a comment on paragraph 30 0 Readings, Bill. The University in Ruins. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1996.

31 Leave a comment on paragraph 31 0 Redden, Elizabeth. “Unread Monographs, Uninspired Undergrads.” Inside Higher Ed. 18 Mar 2009. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/03/18/production.

32 Leave a comment on paragraph 32 0 Regalado, Mariana. “Research Authority in the Age of Google: Equilibrium Sought.” Library Philosophy and Practice (2007). http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/regalado.htm.

33 Leave a comment on paragraph 33 0 Renear, Allen H. “Text Encoding.” A Companion to Digital Humanities. Ed. Raymond Siemens, Susan Schreibman, & John Unsworth. Oxford: Black, 2004. 218-239.

34 Leave a comment on paragraph 34 0 Rennie, Drummond. “Commentary on Fabiato, A., ‘Anonymity of Reviewers’.” Cardiovascular Research 28 (1994): 1142-1143.

35 Leave a comment on paragraph 35 0 —. “Editorial Peer Review: Its Development and Rationale.” Peer Review in Health Sciences. Ed. Fiona Godlee & Tom Jefferson. London: BMJ Books, 2003. 1-13.

36 Leave a comment on paragraph 36 0 Report of the MLA Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion. Modern Language Association of America, 2006. http://www.mla.org/pdf/task_force_tenure_promo.pdf.

37 Leave a comment on paragraph 37 0 Rheingold, Howard. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2000.

38 Leave a comment on paragraph 38 0 Rich, Motoko. “Publishers Announce Staff Cuts.” The New York Times 4 Dec 2008: B1.

39 Leave a comment on paragraph 39 0 Rosenblatt, Bill. “The Digital Object Identifier: Solving the Dilemma of Copyright Protection Online.” Journal of Electronic Publishing 3.2 (1997). http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3336451.0003.204.

40 Leave a comment on paragraph 40 0 Roy, Rustum, and James R. Ashburn. “The perils of peer review.” Nature 414.6862 (2001): 393-394.

41 Leave a comment on paragraph 41 0 Ruecker, Stan, and Alan Galey. “Design as a Hermeneutic Process: Thinking Through Making from Book History to Critical Design.” Digital Humanities 2009. College Park, Maryland, 2009. 240-41.

42 Leave a comment on paragraph 42 0 Saint-Amour, Paul K. The Copywrights: Intellectual Property and the Literary Imagination. Ithaca, N.Y: Cornell University Press, 2003.

43 Leave a comment on paragraph 43 0 Schiff, Stacy. “Know It All.” The New Yorker 31 Jul 2006. http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/07/31/060731fa_fact.

44 Leave a comment on paragraph 44 0 Schneider, Karen G. “Lots of Librarians Can Keep Stuff Safe: Libraries Are Able to Safeguard Content with LOCKSS, Open Source Digital Preservation Software.” Library Journal 132.13 (2007): 30-31.

45 Leave a comment on paragraph 45 0 Sconce, Jeffrey. Haunted Media: Electronic Presence from Telegraphy to Television. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.

46 Leave a comment on paragraph 46 0 SEASR. http://seasr.org/.

47 Leave a comment on paragraph 47 0 Seglen, Per O. “Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.” British Journal of Medicine 314 (1997): 497.

48 Leave a comment on paragraph 48 0 Shatz, David. Peer Review: A Critical Inquiry. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.

49 Leave a comment on paragraph 49 0 Shirky, Clay. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: The Penguin Press, 2008.

50 Leave a comment on paragraph 50 0 —. “Ontology is Overrated.” Clay Shirky’s Writings About the Internet. 2005. http://www.shirky.com/writings/ontology_overrated.html.

51 Leave a comment on paragraph 51 0 Siemens, Ray, John Unsworth, and Susan Schreibman. A Companion to Digital Humanities. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/.

52 Leave a comment on paragraph 52 0 Silvia, Paul J. How to Write a Lot: A Practical Guide to Productive Academic Writing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2007.

53 Leave a comment on paragraph 53 0 Simone, Raffaelle. “The Body of the Text.” The Future of the Book. Ed. Geoffrey Nunberg. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996. 239-251.

54 Leave a comment on paragraph 54 0 “Skin Footnotes.” Shelley Jackson’s Ineradicable Stain. http://www.ineradicablestain.com/footnotes.html.

55 Leave a comment on paragraph 55 0 Smith, Alexandra. “Scientists concerned over research assessment changes.” The Guardian 7 Dec 2006. http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2006/dec/07/highereducation.researchassessmentexercise.

56 Leave a comment on paragraph 56 0 Smith, Richard. “Commentary: The power of the unrelenting impact factor–Is it a force for good or harm?.” International Journal of Epidemiology 35.5 (2006): 1129-1130.

57 Leave a comment on paragraph 57 0 Sperberg-McQueen, C.M., and Lou Burnard, eds. TEI P5: Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange. The TEI Consortium, 2009.

58 Leave a comment on paragraph 58 0 Spier, Ray. “The History of the Peer-Review Process.” TRENDS in Biotechnology 20.8 (2002): 357-358.

59 Leave a comment on paragraph 59 0 Stallings, Ariel Meadow. “Matthew Baldwin: Writer, Blogger, Pretty Okay Guy.” Microspotting 2008. http://www.microspotting.com/2008/07/matthew-baldwin-defective-yeti.

60 Leave a comment on paragraph 60 0 Stallybrass, Peter. “Books and Scrolls: Navigating the Bible.” Books and Readers in Early Modern England. Ed. Jennifer Andersen & Elizabeth Sauer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2002. 42-79.

61 Leave a comment on paragraph 61 0 —. “Little Jobs: Broadsides and the Printing Revolution.” Agent of Change: Print Culture Studies After Elizabeth L. Eisenstein. Ed. Sabrina A Baron, Eric N Lindquist, & Eleanor F Shevlin. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2007. 315-41.

62 Leave a comment on paragraph 62 0 —. “Textual Studies and the Book.” Conference presentation. Modern Language Association. Philadelphia. December 2006.

63 Leave a comment on paragraph 63 0 Stein, Bob. “Jaron Lanier’s Essay on ‘The Hazards of the New Online Collectivism’.” if:book 8 Aug 2006. http://www.futureofthebook.org/blog/archives/2006/08/jaron_laniers_essay_on_digital.html.

64 Leave a comment on paragraph 64 0 Stephens, Mitchell. “Holy of Holies: On the Constituents of Emptiness.” Dec 2006. http://www.futureofthebook.org/mitchellstephens/holyofholies/.

65 Leave a comment on paragraph 65 0 Sun, Sam, Larry Lannom, and Brian Boesch. “RFC 3650 Handle System Overview.” Handle System Nov 2003. http://www.handle.net/rfc/rfc3650.html.

66 Leave a comment on paragraph 66 0 Sunstein, Cass R. Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

67 Leave a comment on paragraph 67 0 Sutherland, Meghan. “Rigor/Mortis: The Industrial Life of Style in American Zombie Cinema.” Framework: The Journal of Cinema and Media 48.2 (2007): 64-78.

68 Leave a comment on paragraph 68 0 Sutor, Bob. “Open Source vs. Open Standards.” Bob Sutor. http://www.sutor.com/newsite/drupal/osvsos.

69 Leave a comment on paragraph 69 0 Swales, John, and Christine B Feak. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2004.

Page 57

Source: http://mcpress.media-commons.org/plannedobsolescence/bibliography/bibliography-n-s/